Defending Fraud, Forgery and Identity Theft Charges

Fraud cases are built on documents: bank records, emails, invoices and account logs. They are often investigated for months before a charge is laid, and the first sign may be a call from a police officer or a meeting request from an employer. This page explains fraud and related charges in Ontario and the steps to take at each stage. A criminal defence lawyer at Law Wise, based in Mississauga and serving the entire GTA and Ontario, can help you respond to a fraud, forgery or identity theft charge.

Open leather wallet with cards on a wooden table

What fraud means in law

Section 380 of the Criminal Code makes it an offence to defraud the public or any person of property, money, valuable security or a service by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means. The Supreme Court of Canada has explained the elements (R v Théroux, [1993] 2 SCR 5). The Crown must prove a dishonest act, and a deprivation caused by it, which can be an actual loss or putting another person’s money or property at risk. It must also prove that the accused knew they were doing the dishonest act and knew it could cause that deprivation.

This is the line between a crime and a civil dispute. A business that fails, a loan that is not repaid, or a contract that is broken is not fraud unless there was dishonesty. Many fraud defences turn on that point: what the accused knew and intended at the time.

Fraud and related offences: maximum penalties

  • Fraud over $5,000 (s 380(1)(a)). Indictable only. Up to 14 years. A minimum of two years applies where the total value exceeds $1 million.
  • Fraud of $5,000 or less (s 380(1)(b)). Up to 2 years by indictment, or summary conviction.
  • False pretences (s 362). Obtaining property by a false statement. Up to 10 years by indictment where the value is over $5,000, and up to 2 years where it is $5,000 or less, or summary conviction. Obtaining credit by a false pretence or a false financial statement carries up to 10 years.
  • Forgery and using a forged document (ss 366 to 368). Up to 10 years by indictment, or summary conviction.
  • Identity theft (s 402.2). Obtaining or possessing another person’s identity information with intent to use it in a fraud-type offence. Up to 5 years by indictment, or summary conviction.
  • Identity fraud (s 403). Fraudulently pretending to be another person to gain an advantage, obtain property, cause a disadvantage or avoid arrest. Up to 10 years by indictment, or summary conviction.
  • Credit card offences (s 342). Stealing, forging, or knowingly using a stolen or forged card. Up to 10 years by indictment, or summary conviction.

Source: Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, ss 342, 362, 366 to 368, 380, 402.2 and 403, as they read on 11 October 2026 (Justice Laws version current to 21 September 2026).

Why the $5,000 line matters

The value alleged changes the case. Fraud over $5,000 can be prosecuted only by indictment and carries a 14-year maximum. Because of that maximum, an absolute or conditional discharge is not available for it (s 730). Fraud of $5,000 or less can be prosecuted by summary conviction and a discharge is legally possible. How the Crown calculates the amount, and whether several transactions are properly added together, is therefore worth close attention.

What makes a fraud sentence heavier

When sentencing for fraud, the court must treat the following as aggravating circumstances (s 380.1):

  • the size, complexity, duration or degree of planning of the fraud was significant;
  • the offence involved a large number of victims;
  • the offence had a significant impact on the victims, given their age, health and financial situation;
  • the offender took advantage of the high regard in which they were held in the community;
  • the offender did not comply with a licensing requirement or professional standard that applied to the activity;
  • the offender concealed or destroyed records relating to the fraud.

The court also may not treat the offender’s job, skills or reputation as mitigating if those were used to commit the offence (s 380.1(2)). A court that convicts or discharges an offender may order restitution, which is repayment of a loss that can be readily calculated (s 738).

How fraud cases begin

Desk with a calculator and laptop

Fraud investigations start in several ways: an employer’s internal audit, a complaint from a client or business partner, a bank’s fraud unit, a government agency reviewing benefit or tax claims, or a lender reviewing a mortgage application. The police may obtain court orders for bank and account records long before they speak to the person concerned. When contact comes, it is often an invitation to “come in and give your side”. There is no obligation to attend an interview or to answer questions, and what is said in that interview usually becomes the centre of the Crown’s case. An employer’s meeting is similar: notes and admissions made there can be passed to the police. The time to get legal advice is before either conversation, not after. A fraud allegation can also bring a civil claim for the money and, for regulated professionals, a complaint to the regulator. What is said in one proceeding can affect the others, so they need to be handled together.

Issues a defence lawyer looks at

  • Intent. Whether the evidence proves dishonesty, or is equally consistent with error, poor record-keeping or a genuine belief in authority to act.
  • Authorization. Whether the transactions were approved, tolerated or directed by someone with authority.
  • Who did it. Shared passwords, shared terminals and delegated signing authority can make it difficult to prove who carried out a transaction.
  • The amount. Whether the loss alleged is accurate, and whether it is over or under $5,000.
  • The records. Whether the documents are complete and reliable, and how they were obtained. Searches of phones, computers and accounts must comply with the Charter.
  • Delay. Complex cases take time, and the right to be tried within a reasonable time applies (R v Jordan, 2016 SCC 27).

First steps if you are under investigation or charged

  1. Do not give a statement without adviceThis applies to the police, an employer’s investigator, an insurer and a regulator.
  2. Preserve recordsDo not delete emails, messages or files, and do not alter documents. Destroying records can become a separate allegation and is an aggravating factor.
  3. Do not repay or sign anything yetRepayment can be important, but the timing and the wording of any agreement should be reviewed by a lawyer first.
  4. Do not contact witnesses or complainantsLeave communication to your lawyer.
  5. Gather your own documentsCollect contracts, approvals, emails and bank records that show what you were authorized to do.

How Law Wise helps

  • Advising before any police or employer interview, and communicating with investigators on your behalf.
  • Reviewing the financial records and the Crown’s calculation of loss.
  • Assessing the evidence of intent and authorization.
  • Advising on restitution and resolution where appropriate, and on how the criminal case interacts with civil and regulatory matters.
  • Defending the charge at trial where the evidence does not prove dishonesty.

Your file is handled by a Law Wise lawyer licensed by the Law Society of Ontario. Service is available in English, Urdu, Punjabi and Hindi, and, if you retain the firm, fees are explained and confirmed in writing before work starts.

Common questions about fraud charges

My employer says that if I repay the money they will not call the police. Should I?

Get legal advice before you repay or sign anything. An employer cannot guarantee that the police or the Crown will not act, and a written admission can be used in a later prosecution or lawsuit. Repayment may still be in your interest, but the terms matter.

It was a business deal that failed. How is that fraud?

It is not fraud unless the Crown proves dishonesty, such as a false statement about where money would go. Documents from the time, showing what was said and what was done with the funds, are the most important evidence.

The police want to interview me about “irregularities”. Should I go?

Speak with a lawyer first. You are not required to attend or answer questions. A lawyer can find out what the investigation concerns and advise whether, and how, to respond.

Can a fraud charge be resolved without a criminal record?

It depends on the charge and the facts. For fraud of $5,000 or less, outcomes such as diversion or a discharge are legally possible in suitable cases. For fraud over $5,000, a discharge is not available. No outcome can be promised in advance.

Does paying the money back end the case?

No. Restitution is a factor the Crown and the court consider, and it can matter a great deal, but the decision to continue a prosecution belongs to the Crown.

Can a fraud conviction affect my immigration status or professional licence?

Yes. Fraud is an offence of dishonesty, and a conviction can affect immigration status, professional regulation and employment that requires bonding. Get advice on those consequences before any plea. See immigration.

Under investigation or charged with fraud?

Speak with a lawyer before you speak with the police, your employer or a regulator. The conversation is confidential.